<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Long and Short of It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/</link>
	<description>Glug Glug</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peechie</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-37271</link>
		<dc:creator>peechie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/#comment-37271</guid>
		<description>Chris: fair enough, when talking about the play, ie. &quot;Play up to this point was scoreless&quot; meaning, no scoring. But in referring to the game itself, which always has a score (if there were no scorekeeping, its status as a game would be dubious), saying &quot;The game was scoreless&quot; is just dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: fair enough, when talking about the play, ie. &#8220;Play up to this point was scoreless&#8221; meaning, no scoring. But in referring to the game itself, which always has a score (if there were no scorekeeping, its status as a game would be dubious), saying &#8220;The game was scoreless&#8221; is just dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-37270</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/#comment-37270</guid>
		<description>I always interpret &quot;scoreless&quot; as &quot;there was no scoring&quot;, which is accurate in a 0-0 game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always interpret &#8220;scoreless&#8221; as &#8220;there was no scoring&#8221;, which is accurate in a 0-0 game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-37269</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/#comment-37269</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;(pet peeve of mine - calling a game â€œscoreless.â€ There is a score: it is 0-0)&lt;/i&gt;

Also, how people say &quot;overtime settled nothing&quot;.  Sure it did.  It settled that there was to be either a shootout or, before the current rules, a tie.

To address your main point, yeah, TV adds 6 inches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(pet peeve of mine &#8211; calling a game â€œscoreless.â€ There is a score: it is 0-0)</i></p>
<p>Also, how people say &#8220;overtime settled nothing&#8221;.  Sure it did.  It settled that there was to be either a shootout or, before the current rules, a tie.</p>
<p>To address your main point, yeah, TV adds 6 inches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WCG</title>
		<link>http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-37268</link>
		<dc:creator>WCG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2007/11/14/the-long-and-short-of-it/#comment-37268</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting, and I&#039;m not sure what causes it, but most men in show biz are shorter than the norm. Particularly movie stars. The famous example is Sy Stalone, who is 5&#039;2&quot;, but still, most of them don&#039;t top 5&#039;6&quot;. It&#039;s easy to shoot men to make them look taller, and they do, but what I want to know is why? What&#039;s wrong with short guys as movie stars?? (I&#039;m short myself, mind you, so... :) I know it&#039;s a cultural thing that taller somehow equals stronger and more manly, but ... does not compute! :) 

He&#039;d make my laminated list too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting, and I&#8217;m not sure what causes it, but most men in show biz are shorter than the norm. Particularly movie stars. The famous example is Sy Stalone, who is 5&#8217;2&#8243;, but still, most of them don&#8217;t top 5&#8217;6&#8243;. It&#8217;s easy to shoot men to make them look taller, and they do, but what I want to know is why? What&#8217;s wrong with short guys as movie stars?? (I&#8217;m short myself, mind you, so&#8230; <img src='http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I know it&#8217;s a cultural thing that taller somehow equals stronger and more manly, but &#8230; does not compute! <img src='http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>He&#8217;d make my laminated list too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

