Comments on: Patch Redux http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/ Glug Glug Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:20:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: WorldWideWaterCooler http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2500 WorldWideWaterCooler Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:02:34 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2500 [...] ted to write this yesterday, but was afraid I’d jinx myself…) After the great Patch Calamity of 2005, I decided to try a different contraception product - the Nuva [...] [...] ted to write this yesterday, but was afraid I’d jinx myself…) After the great Patch Calamity of 2005, I decided to try a different contraception product - the Nuva [...]

]]> By: peechie http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2205 peechie Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:58:45 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2205 I don't mind the scrolling. People can deal with it! I don’t mind the scrolling. People can deal with it!

]]> By: Peanut http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2203 Peanut Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:47:33 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2203 It's viewable in all browsers! Folks with smaller screen resolutions just have to scroll to the right to see everything. Not the end of the world. Annoying yes, broken, no. I could have, instead of the image taking up all the space, the container float to the right and cover the image if it doesn't fit on the screen. *shrug* It’s viewable in all browsers!

Folks with smaller screen resolutions just have to scroll to the right to see everything.

Not the end of the world. Annoying yes, broken, no.

I could have, instead of the image taking up all the space, the container float to the right and cover the image if it doesn’t fit on the screen. *shrug*

]]> By: Chris http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2202 Chris Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:54:50 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2202 col: IE has notoriously poor CSS support, which is probably why it looks stupid. Unfortunatly, Microsoft probably won't be doing much to improve it with the future release of IE 7. peechie: If you really want it to be viewable in all browsers, maybe you should have a separate IE page that's just simple, and keep this real page for browsers that work properly. That's if you care, of course. I don't :). Oh, and back on topic, yay birth control :P col: IE has notoriously poor CSS support, which is probably why it looks stupid. Unfortunatly, Microsoft probably won’t be doing much to improve it with the future release of IE 7.

peechie: If you really want it to be viewable in all browsers, maybe you should have a separate IE page that’s just simple, and keep this real page for browsers that work properly. That’s if you care, of course. I don’t :).

Oh, and back on topic, yay birth control :P

]]> By: col http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2200 col Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:19:36 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2200 ack, i'm looking at your site from work (IE 6, win 98) and it looks like bad! The picture to the left takes up way too much room and I have to scroll too far to the right. It just looks distorted. ack, i’m looking at your site from work (IE 6, win 98) and it looks like bad! The picture to the left takes up way too much room and I have to scroll too far to the right. It just looks distorted.

]]> By: nelly http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2199 nelly Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:51:14 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2199 looks good peechie :) looks good peechie :)

]]> By: Devon http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2197 Devon Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:25:41 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2197 Okay, nevermind. It's all better now. :) Okay, nevermind. It’s all better now. :)

]]> By: peanut http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2196 peanut Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:23:46 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2196 There.. a little more squished.. I may play around with the width of the side bar and all that good stuff over the next few days. Should look ok on 1024! There.. a little more squished.. I may play around with the width of the side bar and all that good stuff over the next few days.

Should look ok on 1024!

]]> By: Devon http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2195 Devon Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:15:16 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2195 And I think if I showed you the top, you'd see what I mean. New screenshot incoming. And I think if I showed you the top, you’d see what I mean. New screenshot incoming.

]]> By: Devon http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2194 Devon Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:14:08 +0000 http://www.worldwidewatercooler.com/2005/03/20/patch-redux/#comment-2194 I didn't realize 1024x768 was a low resolution, either! :) I didn’t realize 1024×768 was a low resolution, either! :)

]]>