How’s *that* for cryptic

I just got my first piece of genuine totally from a stranger criticism (i think) on my blog.

Unfortunately, it’s either cryptic, not related to the entry s/he posted on, or just that poorly written.

It’s also by someone who cared enough to read back through almost two months of archives - so they were either super bored, or kinda liked what I had to say until they decided that I suck (I think).

Go here to read the entry and comments, and tell me what you think. Is it cryptic or criticism or what?

8 Responses to “How’s *that* for cryptic”

  1. col Says:

    hm, that is rather strange. and they were looking at such an old entry. gotta love it when strangers stop by and offer up their two cents…

  2. Kyndra Says:

    I call them Trolls. And honestly i wouldn’t call it criticism … that was just plain stupid.

  3. d Says:

    looks like blog spam to me.

    blog spam is a curious thing.. people will post weird comments, hoping that you’ll click on the url.. which will be a website selling something.

    the url on that post doesn’t work, but it *looks* like a spam url to me.

  4. devon Says:

    oh and blog spam is almost always on older entries, for some reason. never figured that part out.

  5. filmgoerjuan Says:

    Well, speaking as a total stranger who’s only been reading your blog for a few days, I have to cast my vote for “mindless troll”.

    The post you made was just an open call to the people who regularly read your blog (emphasis on *your*)…what should this person care about it?

  6. rtav Says:

    It looks like blog spam to you?
    Is your head full of ROTTEN BORSCHT?

    It does not look like a spam URL to me!!! It looks like a RUSSIAN URL!! Or Mexican.

    Viva Cuba!!

  7. dave Says:

    s/he was bored

  8. Clories Says:

    I say screw em! If they have enough time on their hands to go that far back, they are the ones with the issue!